Get your facts straight...take a little less time rubbin that rubber dolly of yours and put it to better use (the time that is not the dolly) by actually reading the post you comment on!
War. What is it good for?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CA$HFLOW, that's what!<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
"And above all, Fascism, the more it considers and observes the future and the development of humanity quite apart from political considerations of the moment, believes neither in the possibility nor the utility of perpetual peace... War alone brings up to its highest tension all human energy and puts the stamp of nobility upon the people who have the courage to meet it."
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4377.htm
they put some black guy on a plane, who is on a no fly list, who has a device that isn't big enough to take the jet down, is that because they want a scare but just a little one, that doesn't make them look like they aren't doing there jobs. yes he got this pass us but it was so small, if it had been bigger we would have seen it. and of course it gave them what they wanted, more rights and power to control you at any airport. a while back a mother with her 5 year old son, who's name was on a no fly list was stopped and taken for questions, searched and scared to death.
they are using the same play book that hilter used, its not jews this time it's Christian, just this week The so-called “Israel Antiquities Authority” (IAA) stole one of the Christian holy gates (Mary’s Gate) from the Church of the Sepulchre in Jerusalem, which is the most sacred Christian place in the world. and so it starts.
Big words and bad attitude are emblematic of the greatest problems of our time: A cover for STUPIDITY & ignorance bordering on insanity. If insanity is committing the same failed actions over/over and expecting different results, then the stateside sheeple have to be the grandest offenders of all time. They don't know it but their future has been predetermined for at least a century & probably more likely 5.
Anyhow, what's your point? Or am I confusing you with cheezo or omega drone? It is going to be truly satisfying for me to watch the bootlicking 'better days ahead' entitlement crowd be crushed under the weight of REALITY.
Americans Are Hell-Bent On Tyranny
By Paul Craig Roberts
12-26-9
December 22, 2009 "Information Clearing House" -- Obama's dwindling band of true believers has taken heart that their man has finally delivered on one of his many promises--the closing of the Guantanamo prison. But the prison is not being closed. It is being moved to Illinois, if the Republicans permit.
In truth, Obama has handed his supporters another defeat. Closing Guantanamo meant ceasing to hold people in violation of our legal principles of habeas corpus and due process and ceasing to torture them in violation of US and international laws.
All Obama would be doing would be moving 100 people, against whom the US government is unable to bring a case, from the prison in Guantanamo to a prison in Thomson, Illinois.
Are the residents of Thomson despondent that the US government has chosen their town as the site on which to continue its blatant violation of US legal principles? No, the residents are happy. It means jobs.
The hapless prisoners had a better chance of obtaining release from Guantanamo. Now the prisoners are up against two US senators, a US representative, a mayor, and a state governor who have a vested interest in the prisoners' permanent detention in order to protect the new prison jobs in the hamlet devastated by unemployment.
Neither the public nor the media have ever shown any interest in how the detainees came to be incarcerated. Most of the detainees were unprotected people who were captured by Afghan war lords and sold to the Americans as "terrorists" in order to collect a proffered bounty. It was enough for the public and the media that the Defense Secretary at the time, Donald Rumsfeld, declared the Guantanamo detainees to be the "780 most dangerous people on earth."
The vast majority have been released after years of abuse. The 100 who are slated to be removed to Illinois have apparently been so badly abused that the US government is afraid to release them because of the testimony the prisoners could give to human rights organizations and foreign media about their mistreatment.
Our British allies are showing more moral conscience than Americans are able to muster. Former PM Tony Blair, who provided cover for President Bush's illegal invasion of Iraq, is being damned for his crimes by UK officialdom testifying before the Chilcot Inquiry.
The London Times on December 14 summed up the case against Blair in a headline: "Intoxicated by Power, Blair Tricked Us Into War." Two days later the British First Post declared: "War Crime Case Against Tony Blair Now Rock-solid." In an unguarded moment Blair let it slip that he favored a conspiracy for war regardless of the validity of the excuse [weapons of mass destruction] used to justify the invasion.
The movement to bring Blair to trial as a war criminal is gathering steam. Writing in the First Post Neil Clark reported: "There is widespread contempt for a man [Blair] who has made millions [his reward from the Bush regime] while Iraqis die in their hundreds of thousands due to the havoc unleashed by the illegal invasion, and who, with breathtaking arrogance, seems to regard himself as above the rules of international law." Clark notes that the West's practice of shipping Serbian and African leaders off to the War Crimes Tribunal, while exempting itself, is wearing thin.
In the US, of course, there is no such attempt to hold to account Bush, Cheney, Condi Rice, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and the large number of war criminals that comprised the Bush Regime. Indeed, Obama, whom Republicans love to hate, has gone out of his way to protect the Bush cohort from being held accountable.
Here in Great Moral America we only hold accountable celebrities and politicians for their sexual indiscretions. Tiger Woods is paying a bigger price for his girlfriends than Bush or Cheney will ever pay for the deaths and ruined lives of millions of people. The consulting company, Accenture Plc, which based its marketing program on Tiger Woods, has removed Woods from its Web site. Gillette announced that the company is dropping Woods from its print and broadcast ads. AT&T says it is re-evaluating the company's relationship with Woods.
Apparently, Americans regard sexual infidelity as far more serious than invading countries on the basis of false charges and deception, invasions that have caused the deaths and displacement of millions of innocent people. Remember, the House impeached President Clinton not for his war crimes in Serbia, but for lying about his
affair with Monica Lewinsky.
Americans are more upset by Tiger Woods' sexual affairs than they are by the Bush and Obama administrations' destruction of US civil liberty. Americans don't seem to mind that "their" government for the last 8 years has resorted to the detention practices of 1,000 years ago--simply grab a person and throw him into a dungeon forever without bringing charges and obtaining a conviction.
According to polls, Americans support torture, a violation of both US and international law, and Americans don't mind that their government violates the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and spies on them without obtaining warrants from a court. Apparently, the brave citizens of the "sole remaining superpower" are so afraid of terrorists that they are content to give up liberty for safety, an impossible feat.
Do you believe everything the government tells you? Economist and statistician John Williams sure doesn't. Williams, who has consulted for individuals and Fortune 500 companies, now uncovers the truth behind the U.S. government's economic numbers on his Web site at ShadowStats.com. Williams says, over the last several decades, the feds have been infusing their data with optimistic biases to make the economy seem far rosier than it really is. His site reruns the numbers using the original methodology. What he found was not good.
Maymin: So we are technically bankrupt?
Williams: Yes, and when countries are in that state, what they usually do is rev up the printing presses and print the money they need to meet their obligations. And that creates inflation, hyperinflation, and makes the currency worthless.
Obama says America will go bankrupt if Congress doesn't pass the health care bill.
Well, it's going to go bankrupt if they do pass the health care bill, too, but at least he's thinking about it. He talks about it publicly, which is one thing prior administrations refused to do. Give him credit for that. But what he's setting up with this health care system will just accelerate the process.
Where are we right now?
In terms of the GDP, we are about halfway to depression level. If you look at retail sales, industrial production, we are already well into depressionary. If you look at things such as the housing industry, the new orders for durable goods we are in Great Depression territory. If we have hyperinflation, which I see coming not too far down the road, that would be so disruptive to our system that it would result in the cessation of many levels of normal economic commerce, and that would throw us into a great depression, and one worse than was seen in the 1930s.
What kind of hyperinflation are we talking about?
I am talking something like you saw with the Weimar Republic of the 1930s. There the currency became worthless enough that people used it actually as toilet paper or wallpaper. You could go to a fine restaurant and have an expensive dinner and order an expensive bottle of wine. The next morning that empty bottle of wine is worth more as scrap glass than it had been the night before filled with expensive wine.
We just saw an extreme example in Zimbabwe. ... Probably the most extreme hyperinflation that anyone has ever seen. At the same time, you still had a functioning, albeit troubled, Zimbabwe economy. How could that be? They had a workable backup system of a black market in U.S. dollars. We don't have a backup system of anything. Our system, with its heavy dependence on electronic currency, in a hyperinflation would not do well. It would probably cease to function very quickly. You could have disruptions in supply chains to food stores. The economy would devolve into something like a barter system until they came up with a replacement global currency.
What can we do to avoid hyperinflation? What if we just shut down the Fed or something like that?
We can't. The actions have already been taken to put us in it. It's beyond control. The government does put out financial statements usually in December using generally accepted accounting principles, where unfunded liabilities like Medicare and Social Security are included in the same way as corporations account for their employee pension liabilities. And in 2008, for example, the one-year deficit was $5.1 trillion dollars. And that's instead of the $450 billion, plus or minus, that was officially reported.
Wow.
These numbers are beyond containment. Even the 2008 numbers, you can take 100 percent of people's income and corporate profit and you'd still be in deficit. There's no way you can raise enough money in taxes.
What about spending?
If you eliminated all federal expenditures except for Medicare and Social Security, you'd still be in deficit. You have to slash Social Security and Medicare. But I don't see any political will to rein in the costs the way they have to be reined in. There's just no way it can be contained. The total federal debt and net present value of the unfunded liabilities right now totals about $75 trillion. That's five times the level of GDP.
What can we, the people, do to stop the government from, you know, taking all our money?
We should have acted 20 years ago. There's not much you can do at this point to prevent the eventual debasement of the dollar. This involves both sides of the political spectrum. It's not limited to the Republicans or the Democrats. They've both been very active in setting this up.
What can individuals do?
The only thing individuals can do now is look to protect themselves. I wish I could see a way, but shy of severe slashing of the social programs that is so politically reprehensible and would create such problems and social unrest, I don't see that as a practical solution.
If you're a young 20- or 25-year-old guy or gal, would you move to another country? What would you do?
We still have a great country. We're going through a period of economic pain. It's happened before. This is the kind of thing that's taken us decades to get into and it will take us decades to get out. Although the hyperinflation is going to be limited largely to the U.S., the economic downturn will affect things globally. I can't tell you how things will go with a hyperinflationary Great Depression, which is where I see things going.
It's the type of thing that will tend to lead to significant political change. People tend to vote their pocketbooks. You could have the rise of a third party. You could even have rioting in the streets. I'm not formally predicting that — anyone can run these different scenarios. For the individual, what you need to do, from an investment standpoint, look to preserve your wealth and assets. Don't worry about the day-to-day fluctuations in the markets. What I'm talking about here is over the long haul...
[Gold is] going to be highly volatile, as will the dollar, over the near term, but longer term, physical gold I would look at as a primary hedge for preserving the purchasing power of your wealth and assets. Maybe some physical silver. Get some assets outside the U.S. dollar. I might even look to move some assets physically outside the United States. The key here is to look at a longer range survival package, battening down the hatches, and preserving your wealth and assets during a very difficult time. Once you're through that, you'll have some extraordinary investment opportunities, and I can't tell you what it's going to be like on the other side of this crisis.
Analysis Of The Obama Interpol Order
12-24-9
INTERPOL - an international law enforcement agency - has just been granted complete and utter "diplomatic immunity" within the borders of the United States, courtesy of Obama. They are not subject to any Constitutional limitations within the United States. Good luck filing for discovery, documents, witnesses or subpoenas against a police force that is operating outside of the Constitution in your own country! You can't sue them. Their records can't be searched. They are not subject to FOIA requests. You probably won't even know the name of the agent prosecuting you if INTERPOL comes to visit. And they don't have to tell you either.
Quote:
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words "except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act" and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.
Quote:
By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and statutes of the United States, including Section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669, 22 U.S.C. 288), it is hereby ordered that the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), in which the United States participates pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 263a, is hereby designated as a public international organization entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions and immunities conferred by the International Organizations Immunities Act; except those provided by Section 2(c), the portions of Section 2(d) and Section 3 relating to customs duties and federal internal-revenue importation taxes, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act. This designation is not intended to abridge in any respect the privileges, exemptions or immunities which such organization may have acquired or may acquire by international agreement or by Congressional action.
So Obama's Amendment turns Reagan's EO 12425 into:
Quote:
By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and statutes of the United States, including Section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669, 22 U.S.C. 288), it is hereby ordered that the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), in which the United States participates pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 263a, is hereby designated as a public international organization entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions and immunities conferred by the International Organizations Immunities Act. This designation is not intended to abridge in any respect the privileges, exemptions or immunities which such organization may have acquired or may acquire by international agreement or by Congressional action.
Wow, that's a lot of "except those provided by sections" deleted! So there's NO restrictions anymore? Keep reading....
Section 2(c) covers SEARCH AND SEIZURE! INTERPOL is now untouchable on US soil. Remember, the original EO excluded these exemptions! These exemptions now apply to INTERPOL on US soil.
Quote:
(c) Property and assets of international organizations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, unless such immunity be expressly waived, and from confiscation. The archives of international organizations shall be inviolable.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/inviolable
Quote:
1. prohibiting violation; secure from destruction, violence, infringement, or desecration: an inviolable sanctuary; an inviolable promise.
2. incapable of being violated; incorruptible; unassailable: inviolable secrecy.
Section 3 exempts duties and taxation from baggage. INTERPOL now can bring in (or out) a bag with whatever it wants in it. How can you impose duty or tax on something inside a bag you can't search?
Quote:
§ 288b. Baggage and effects of officers and employees exempted from customs duties and internal revenue taxes
Pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Commissioner of Customs with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, the baggage and effects of alien officers and employees of international organizations, or of aliens designated by foreign governments to serve as their representatives in or to such organizations, or of the families, suites, and servants of such officers, employees, or representatives shall be admitted (when imported in connection with the arrival of the owner) free of customs duties and free of internal-revenue taxes imposed upon or by reason of importation.
Section 4 exempts all property taxes being levied. INTERPOL can now build or occupy whatever properties it wants within the US and not have to pay any property taxes of any sort.
Quote:
§ 288c. Exemption from property taxes
International organizations shall be exempt from all property taxes imposed by, or under the authority of, any Act of Congress, including such Acts as are applicable solely to the District of Columbia or the Territories.
Section 5 gives immunity from any sort of registration of foreign agents. INTERPOL now doesn't even need to declare themselves or presumably even need a passport to enter the US. SHADOW POLICE! Don't believe me? Read it for yourself! Oh and you can't sue any of them for any reason.
Quote:
§ 288d. Privileges, exemptions, and immunities of officers, employees, and their families; waiver
(a) Persons designated by foreign governments to serve as their representatives in or to international organizations and the officers and employees of such organizations, and members of the immediate families of such representatives, officers, and employees residing with them, other than nationals of the United States, shall, insofar as concerns laws regulating entry into and departure from the United States, alien registration and fingerprinting, and the registration of foreign agents, be entitled to the same privileges, exemptions, and immunities as are accorded under similar circumstances to officers and employees, respectively, of foreign governments, and members of their families.
(b) Representatives of foreign governments in or to international organizations and officers and employees of such organizations shall be immune from suit and legal process relating to acts performed by them in their official capacity and falling within their functions as such representatives, officers, or employees except insofar as such immunity may be waived by the foreign government or international organization concerned.
Section 6, last but not least, sets requirements that foreign agents be "recognized" by the State Dept in order to receive the immunities in this Act. Not anymore!
Quote:
§ 288e. Personnel entitled to benefits
(a) Notification to and acceptance by Secretary of State of personnel
No person shall be entitled to the benefits of this subchapter, unless he
(1) shall have been duly notified to and accepted by the Secretary of State as a representative, officer, or employee; or
(2) shall have been designated by the Secretary of State, prior to formal notification and acceptance, as a prospective representative, officer, or employee; or
(3) is a member of the family or suite, or servant, of one of the foregoing accepted or designated representatives, officers, or employees.
(b) Deportation of undesirables
Should the Secretary of State determine that the continued presence in the United States of any person entitled to the benefits of this subchapter is not desirable, he shall so inform the foreign government or international organization concerned, as the case may be, and after such person shall have had a reasonable length of time, to be determined by the Secretary of State, to depart from the United States, he shall cease to be entitled to such benefits.
(c) Extent of diplomatic status
& pass the death.. err healthcare legislation before Christmas Eve.. How touching. What heartfelt empathy he has for his proletariat!
Furthermore, he wishes to work out the details of the Afghanistan debacle in order that no bid cost plus defense contracts are properly awarded to all his lackeys who are actually his overseers.
It's just that the rank & file haven't figured that out yet. Man, ain't this all morphing into a monster more bizarre & nauseating than a thinking person could ever have imagined? I think..yes!
All of you who wish to dispel all notions of a benevolent cadre working on your behalf might be interested in a new book titled 'Full Spectrum Dominance'. I am finding it to be very interesting and corroborative of much that I've learned over the past several years. You may also find that this book puts many of the jagged pieces of modern conquest into perspective-- however frightening IT IS!
Now that the key phrase has been highlighted FOR you, do you understand it? Now, even the 'global cooling' crowd dons the pom-poms and joins in the fight to put what's left of the working stiff/entitlement army to work paying for their own destruction.
It has nothing to do with saving the planet, it has to do with saving our own ass, and more specifically making a profit for the central bank. and dozens of others.
If it were real and anyone gave a shit we would have been driving electric cars and running the lights on solar power, 100 years ago, are we ? are we going to any time soon. ?
I hardly think so, climate gate , the carbon, tax, and the proposed climate tax on international bank transactions, are proof no one gives a shit. just for profit.
I think its so obvious who is controlling the energy policies of the planet, that it goes with out saying,
He who has the oil rules the world, is this not obvious, and if you have oil ,build a nuclear bomb to protect it. duh, a no brainer.
insted of sharing it for the good of the people use it for your contries own gluteny.
Instead of using the money to reasearch a better cleaner more sustainable energy source just keep driving million dollar bentleys around.
Who wants clean air and a nice quite car or bus to run around on any way ?
If we can send a man to the moon and a space ship to mars and beyound it seems very doable.
If the basic no brianer things were taken care of we woldnt even be talkin about these things.
Most stuff here in CR I can deal with all right but waiting in line for a sim card brings out the ugly American in me, that rates right up there with renewing my drivers license.
Let's see if the new Chinese network is truly improved. Isn't it next year that I.C.E. gets competition from other providers complements of CAFTA?
What are these people protesting? This conference is intended to produce some agreements BUT the side shows are making the whole thing out to be a total clusterfuck. It is taking HOURS for some of the participants to make it to the meetings because of this!! Break-out the water cannons, put these pieces of shits in camps for a week or so, send the god dam Tuvalu delegation & their friggin Bali allies home on the next train. The chairwoman has stepped down in the middle of this wretched cesspool of mindless banter from so called intellectuals.
AND FOR WHAT? Partz I do agree that man is creating a good deal of the problems in this. BUT, once again the US, ie the American taxpayer, is going to get stuck picking up the tab, while India, China, Brazil garner the proceeds, ignore the pacts & continue to poison hapless Boto's. The US should back out, put into law the most feasible solutions & demand the same from their major trading partners. The Congo, Bali, Yemen, Micronesia & the Seychelles can all thank us later - what they have to say no is of no importance.
I hope this Volcano in the Phillippines puts us in a long term winter! These fucks will be begging for global warming!
Here's a question for the deep thinkers here: Do you think it matters in the least what YOU or I think on this matter?
The die has been cast.
Do you think that no matter how many "scientific" studies are constructed that the goals of those pushing this shit down your throats will be swept aside? Money can't buy love but it sure can buy scientists & politicos.
Has it occurred to anyone that these 'treaties' or 'agreements' about to be signed WILL be the death knell for what is left of industry in the west?
How about the drama with all the walk-outs and hand wringing? I had to laugh at that. The U.N. LOVES you to death. Remember RED mentioning RWANDA tongue-in-cheek the other day? The UN was there I believe! And now they're gonna love you down some more.
Finally, as I just KNEW would happen.. I see in the press that...are you ready? China & the Pac rim manufacturing juggernaut, well, they just aren't going to play ball with the church of climatology. Tsk tsk tsk.
Unfortunately, even though the deniers are a minority in world opinion, American opinion and scientific opinion, their side will have its way and win because reason and truth always have to struggle for acceptance [even without skeptics]. whenever great sacrifices are required. Copenhagen is failing. Wealthy countries don't want to make the needed sacrifices, poor countries are using it for a reason to get more aid. In the end we will all lose.
(translation: DON'T panic mom & pop idiot! [but we know you are and will soon be begging for another double dose for your whole litter]). Cha CHING! .. and why not? The 6 or so vaccine mfgr's were fully indemnified against ANY & ALL LIABILITIES due to sickness or DEATH by injection by Jr. Bush in '06! JAB AWAYYYYYYY!! I suppose this is tin hat theory as well! The insane-a-thon continues in force!
By MIKE STOBBE, AP Medical Writer Mike Stobbe, Ap Medical Writer – 5 mins ago
ATLANTA – Hundreds of thousands of swine flu shots for children have been recalled because tests indicate the vaccine doses lost some strength, government health officials said Tuesday.
The recall is for about 800,000 pre-filled syringes intended for young children, ages 6 months to nearly 3 years. The shots, made by Sanofi Pasteur, were distributed across the country last month and most have already been used, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Doctors were notified of the voluntary recall on Tuesday. Dr. Anne Schuchat, a CDC flu expert, stressed that parents don't need to do anything or to worry. The vaccine is still safe, she said.
The issue is the vaccine's strength. Tests done before the shots were shipped showed that the vaccines were strong enough. But tests done weeks later indicated the strength had fallen slightly below required levels. Why the potency dropped isn't clear.
Children in that age group are supposed to get two doses, spaced about a month apart. Health officials don't think children need to get vaccinated again, even if they got two doses from the same lots, said Schuchat.
Swine flu vaccine has been available since early October, and since then manufacturers have released about 95 million doses for distribution in the United States.
The recalled shots were made by Sanofi Pasteur, the vaccines division of France-based Sanofi-Aventis Group. The company reported the potency findings to the government officials and did a voluntary recall. A Sanofi Pasteur representative could not immediately be reached for comment Tuesday.
Sanofi Pasteur bills itself as the No. 1 manufacturer of flu vaccines in the world. It makes flu vaccine at sites in France and in Pennsylvania.
There is reason Im in CR, its not the women, allthough there beautiful, Im Married happily.
Its not that its cheap, it aint.
Its thAT THE ATTITUDE IN AMERICA OF RUN ME OVER AND FUCK ME WHEN YOUR DONE ATTITUDE MAKES ME SICK.
Im not nearly old enough to collect SS and live it out here, I do have to return, and then what, fall right back into the yes sir system, keep paying more and more taxes for nothing.
Ya nothing, the roads are paved on the gas tax.
The cops are payed for on the property tax.
The firemen are payed for on the property tax.
Give me fucking break all ready.
The proofs there , beyound a reasonable doubt, with out a doubt, all the subliminal messages and actions prove it.
vis a vis all this crazy talk here again: Funny how the oligarchs have been calling for a similar 'event' in order to herd the remaining lost souls into the sheep pen. You know, scare the blubbering boobs into submission. Could we be facing a bio event right now? The boyz always telegraph their intentions. Funny how all the draconian legislation was just waiting on deck for the proper moment of implementation. Funny how the entirety of the world's most powerful tech/surveillance/mil/industrial state fell asleep on the newest day of infamy. Funny how the emergency workers & specifically the hierarchy of the Fire/Rescue apparatus was gagged concerning strange goings on. Funny how a culprit was named almost immediately. Funny how insiders were never brought to justice for buying a shitload of puts immediately before the day of infamy & the SEC is powerless to reveal the buyer. I guess that other building just fell down because the big bad wolf huffed & puffed it into the basement.
Ever stop to notice how diligently & untiringly the bad guys work to convince you otherwise when your gut says, "THIS IS BULLSHIT"!
Sure,, sure. It's a game of diversion. It's a game of taking sides. It's a game of creating enemies out of friends who've outlived their useful life as scum at your disposal & on call to do your dirty work.
Here douchebag: Choke on this:
Comparing the mass media agitprop raising the specters of both a nuclear armed Iran and al-Qaeda, the pro-Israel media was silent on the warnings offered by former CENTCOM Commander, General Tommy Franks. Franks' predictions are cited again by Chossudovsky wherein he predicted the downfall of our democracy mildly referring to the activities of the criminal Cheney-Bush regime. Chossudovsky quotes Franks: "'[A] terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event [will occur] somewhere in the Western world it may be in the United States of America that causes our population to question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize our own country in order to avoid a repeat of another mass, casualty-producing event.' Franks was obliquely alludingto a 'Second 9/11' terrorist attack, which could be used to galvanize US public opinion in support of a military government and police state."
Chossudovsky continues ominously: "It is important to understand that General Franks was not giving a personal opinion on the role of a 'massive casualty-producing event' in National Security doctrine. His statement very much reflects the dominant viewpoint both in the Pentagon and the Department of Homeland Security both on the concept of [a] massive casualty-producing event as well as how events might unfold in the case of a 'Catastrophic Emergency.' The statement comes from a man who has been actively involved in military and intelligence planning at the highest levels. In other words, the 'militarization of our country' is an ongoing operational assumption. It is part of the broader 'Washington consensus'. It identifies the Bush administration's 'roadmap' of war and Homeland defense."
If there are any doubts about the truth and accuracy of the allegation that the Cheney-Bush regime did 9/11, Dr. David Ray Griffin dispels each and every one of them in his latest book on the subject, Debunking 9/11 Debunking. He again emphasizes the stand-down order angrily reiterated by Cheney as overheard and observed by Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta, and to which the latter offered testimony to that fact during the 9/11 Commission hearings. The 9/11 Commission Report falsified the time of Cheney's presence in the bunker-command center, changing the time as occurring after 10:00 a.m. when in fact Cheney was reported by several as being in the bunker earlier at 9:25 a.m.
Griffin's book also brings General Richard Meyers and Donald Rumsfeld into the deadly cabal that day proving their direct involvement via the emergency teleconference they'd like to pretend they weren't part of, also at a much earlier time than the regime would have US believe. Griffin discusses how "journalist" Michael Bronner, when writing a propaganda piece for Vanity Fair, cleverly time-confused these events by relying upon NORAD tapes selectively given to him for his review by the Cheney-Bush perfumed princes of the military. Griffin makes an excellent case debunking the tapes by pointing out how long Cheney-Bush had them thereby facilitating their tampering, and goes on to prove how the timelines on those tapes conflict with the testimony given by the military during the 9/11 Commission hearings.
Even according to these tapes, Cheney wasn't in the bunker until sometime after 10:00 a.m. on the morning of 9/11. But as mentioned, actual eyewitnesses debunk both the 9/11 Commission Report AND the NORAD tapes. Griffin basically asks: Were the tapes wrong, or was the testimony wrong? Actually, the obvious answer is that either members of the military were lying at the time of their testimony, or the tapes were doctored or selectively edited, or both. Griffin proves that both the Bronner-Vanity Fair NORAD tapes and the 9/11 Commission Report conflict materially with the facts.
Cheney-Bush did 9/11 all right, and they probably have already finished plans for the next domestic terrorist event. But where's the proof you might be prompted to ask. The proof is in their very behavior, which increasingly, and on a daily basis, demonstrates their hatred and contempt for America, its people, and its Constitution. They are becoming braver and more arrogant by the day. They know Congress will not act, and part of the reason is probably that Congress knows already that another 9/11 has been planned and is on the way, and that if they attack Cheney-Bush, it is they, Congress, who will be blamed for having invited the attack by evidencing weakness on the Global War on Terror. GWOT is merely a synonym for the aggressive movement towards a global New World Order. And Cheney-Bush have AIPAC on their side and also ready to strike Congress if need be!
The most obvious anomaly of the Cheney-Bush criminal regime is the reverse order of its hierarchy: Cheney is America's real dictator, and Bush his chimpanzee-monkey boy protégé and the regime's White House Moron heat sink. Complaints of Cheney's meddling in military and foreign policy arrangements between Britain and the United States give credence to Cheney's dominating role. And a video of a Bush photo-video op with the press included a scene showing Cheney, likened to a stalking monster about to pounce if needed, and watching Bush from the rear of the room and behind the cameras. He hovered as if he knew Bush needed watching. And the present Cheney flap with the National Archives over the safeguarding of classified national security documentation led Cheney to assert that NO ONE has "oversight" over his activities. Then, following Cheney's absurd assertion, the chimpanzee-monkey boy chimed in: "Me too!" Neither is answerable to the "goddamned piece of paper," the people of America, or the spineless cowards in Congress.
As has been so often articulated in this space, 9/11 is the very source of this criminal administration's power; debunk their officially-stated conspiracy theory, as Dr. Griffin has done repeatedly, and both their source of unlimited power and their credibility will be forever destroyed. As reported by Steve Watson on Prisonplanet.com in an article posted June 25th entitled "Cheney and Bush Declare Autonomous Dictatorial Powers Exempt themselves from executive branch," Watson writes: "The Vice President and the President have casually declared their offices to be independent of the executive branch and completely autonomous, with Dick Cheney also attempting to abolish agencies his office is supposed to be accountable to." Said another way, Cheney-Bush have abolished the executive branch and replaced it with the Office of Dictator.
Watson references events relative to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and quotes from the Committee's report: "Vice President Cheney exempted his office from the presidential order that establishes government-wide procedures for safeguarding classified national security information. The Vice President asserts that his office is not an 'entity within the executive branch.' As described in a letter from Chairman Waxman to the Vice President, the National Archives protested the Vice President's position in letters written in June 2006 and August 2006. When these letters were ignored, the National Archives wrote to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales in January 2007 to seek a resolution of the impasse. The Vice President's staff responded by seeking to abolish the agency within the Archives that is responsible for implementing the President's executive order. In his letter to the Vice President, Chairman Waxman writes: 'I question both the legality and wisdom of your actions. ... [I]t would appear particularly irresponsible to give an office with your history of security breaches an exemption from the safeguards that apply to all other executive branch officials.'"
What is wrong with Congress? Isn't it clear that Cheney runs the country? Where in the Constitution does Cheney get this authority? Certainly he is correct in asserting his only functional responsibility is that of President of the Senate. And he can function in an executive role only when needed to break a tie, which can happen given the possibility of an impasse resultant of an even divide considering two senators per state. But as Cheney claims this constitutional void as a defense for his being immune from the executive branch, he enjoys ruling over this nation based on precisely this very same constitutional void. In other words, there is NO CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS for his being the undesignated yet actual ruler of police state America! And it is precisely this lack of constitutional sanction that defeats Congressman Dennis Kucinich's motion for Cheney's impeachment.
Lack of constitutionally defined duties, however, is NO LONGER a viable argument for Cheney. He just abdicated executive branch accountability, while proving true, at the same time, the Alexander Haig assertion: HE IS INDEED IN CHARGE! And don't bother telling me that all of Washington DC doesn't know this! Watson continues citing excerpts from the mass media proving that even they are now beginning to see the dangers of the Cheney-Bush police state. Watson cites articles from not only the Washington Post, but also from the LA Times and theBoston Globe.
And NBC News chimed in as well, and their perspective was also carried by Prisonplanet .com quoting from a piece: "NBC News: Has the vice president gone too far?" The article by David Edwards and Muriel Kane, also posted June 25th, offers: "NBC called Cheney 'a master of stealth, even inside the White House,' describing how he put through HIS policy of holding detainees indefinitely without charges by handing his proposal to the president without the formal staff review. [Emphasis added.] NBC also noted that 'Cheney's influence turns out to be surprisingly wide-ranging,' encompassing everything from cutting the capital gains tax to ending the ban on snowmobiles in national parks."
We finally have nationally recognized news sources reporting that Cheney is 1) in charge of both domestic and foreign policy [national security information] and 2) is initiating as well domestic policy TOTALLY OUTSIDE HIS CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY! How did this come to be? Who cares?! It proves that Cheney is acting in not only an executive role from the White House, but doing so illegally and with the full cooperation of Bush and the Democratic Congress. Cheney, as chief executive, and Bush as deputy, are violations of all constitutional laws separating and specifically defining American governmental powers.
Impeaching at least one of these two co-conspirators was at one time necessary to defeat the neoconservative lunatic plan to launch World War III by nuking Iran to create the chaos needed for the global New World Order government. Now, impeaching them both is IMMEDIATELY necessary to prevent another 9/11! Considering Cheney-Bush insults directed at Congress framed in a you-can't-touch-us attitude, we are giving dangerous signals to this deadly criminal regime which they now obviously view as a green light for yet another 9/11 terrorist act.
As Watson observes later on in his commentary, "Last month it was also reported that a high-level group of government and military officials has been quietly preparing an emergency survival program named 'The Day After,' which would effectively end civil liberties and implement a system of martial law in the event of a catastrophic attack on a U.S. city." Considering the Cheney-Bush track record and the revelations concerning 9/11 documented by Dr. Griffin, is it really all that hard to imagine the limitless power these criminals can benefit from by initiating yet another 9/11?
Regarding the first 9/11 inside job, Griffin offers motives and methods in his Debunking book more succinctly than I have found elsewhere. Taking the posture of a defense attorney rebutting the one-sided, single-minded prosecutorial objective of the 9/11 Commission in diverting fact and reality away from the obvious guilt of Cheney-Bush, Griffin argues the case for the non-existent "Islamofascist" phantoms:
The 9/11 Commission was thereby able, in its prosecutorial role, to portray bin Laden and his Muslim followers as having a plausible motive: they had declared war on America becauseAmerica, in their eyes, had declared war on Allah and Islam. However, what if there had been attorneys for the defense, who would have argued that the Bush-Cheney administration, besides having had far more means and opportunity to carry out the attacks than did al-Qaeda, also had a more powerful motive? Would there have been any evidence to which they might have pointed? Yes, indeed.
They could have pointed out that a movement known as neoconservatism, which included Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle, and Paul Wolfowitz, had expressed interest in establishing a global Pax Americana, the first all-inclusive empire in history; that in 1992, Cheney, before ending his tenure as secretary of defense, had Wolfowitz write a draft of the Defense Planning Guidance, which has been called "a blueprint for permanent American global hegemony" and Cheney's "Planto rule the world"; that the main points in this document were reaffirmed in a 2000 document entitled "Rebuilding America's Defenses," written by a neoconservative think tank called Project for the New American Century (PNAC); that the stated requirements for the Pax Americana included a huge increase in military spending, a technological transformation of the military to reorient it around computer-guided weapons (including weapons in space), and a revised doctrine of preemptive war that would allow America to attack other nations even if they posed no imminent threat. The defense attorneys for al-Qaeda could also have pointed out that many of the leading neocons, including Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz, had been wanting to take over Iraq and its oil since the early 1990s and that the Bush-Cheney administration had in July 2001 reportedly indicated that it would attack Afghanistan "by the middle of October."
Perhaps most important, these attorneys could have pointed out, Zbigniew Brzezinski had suggested in 1997 that the American public would support "imperial mobilization," through which America could retain its primacy by taking control of the oil-rich region of Central Asia (which includes Afghanistan), only in the event of "a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat" just as the American public had been willing to support "America's engagement in World War II largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor." These defense attorneys could then have pointed out that "Rebuilding America's Defenses," perhaps inspired by Brzezinski's argument, suggested that the process of transforming the USmilitary in the desired direction was "likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor." They could have further pointed out that, besides the fact that 9/11 was widely compared to Pearl Harbor, it was also said to have presented "opportunities" by Bush, Rice, and Rumsfeld, with the latter saying that 9/11 created "the kind of opportunities that World War II offered, to refashion the world." [The above excerpt is from Dr. David Ray Griffin's latest book, Debunking 9/11 Debunking, pages 104 105.]
Only a total madman or a Zionist fanatic faithfully following "The Protocols" would see the horror of war as an "opportunity to refashion the world."
In his paper posted on Global Research on June 24th entitled, "Bush Directive for a 'Catastrophic Emergency' in America: Building a Justification for Waging War on Iran?" also carried onRense.com, Professor Michel Chossudovsky opens by quoting a statement made by a Pentagon official supposedly leaked to the Washington Post on April 23, 2006: "'Another [9/11 type terrorist] attack could create both a justification and an OPPORTUNITY that is lacking today to retaliate against some known targets.'" [Emphasis added.]
Chossudovsky goes on: "The US media consensus is that 'the United States faces its greatest threat of a terrorist assault since the September 11 attacks.'" That the mass media leans heavily pro-Israel is an established fact. Iran, in spite of it having neither threatening nor deployable nuclear capability, is being propagandized as such by the mass media. Chossudovsky observes, "The sheer absurdity that Al Qaeda might have advanced capabilities to wage a nuclear attack on America is, nonetheless, pervasive in the US [pro-Israel] media reports. [Emphasis mine.]
Comparing the mass media agitprop raising the specters of both a nuclear armed Iran and al-Qaeda, the pro-Israel media was silent on the warnings offered by former CENTCOM Commander, General Tommy Franks. Franks' predictions are cited again by Chossudovsky wherein he predicted the downfall of our democracy mildly referring to the activities of the criminal Cheney-Bush regime. Chossudovsky quotes Franks: "'[A] terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event [will occur] somewhere in the Western world it may be in the United States of America that causes our population to question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize our own country in order to avoid a repeat of another mass, casualty-producing event.' Franks was obliquely alludingto a 'Second 9/11' terrorist attack, which could be used to galvanize US public opinion in support of a military government and police state."
Chossudovsky continues ominously: "It is important to understand that General Franks was not giving a personal opinion on the role of a 'massive casualty-producing event' in National Security doctrine. His statement very much reflects the dominant viewpoint both in the Pentagon and the Department of Homeland Security both on the concept of [a] massive casualty-producing event as well as how events might unfold in the case of a 'Catastrophic Emergency.' The statement comes from a man who has been actively involved in military and intelligence planning at the highest levels. In other words, the 'militarization of our country' is an ongoing operational assumption. It is part of the broader 'Washington consensus'. It identifies the Bush administration's 'roadmap' of war and Homeland defense."
The paper highlights Bush's May 2007 National Security Presidential Directive, NSPD-51. It is a directive, a presidential executive order, which establishes procedures for the continuity of government in the case of a "Catastrophic Emergency." It legitimizes the Cheney-Bush dictatorship. Chossudovsky observes, "NSPD 51 has barely been reported by the [pro-Israel] mainstream media. [Emphasis again mine.] There was no press briefing by the White House or by DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff, which would be the normal practice, given the significance and implications of NSPD 51. The text of NSPD 51/HSPD 20, announced by the White House is not even mentioned on the DHS's website.
Chossudovsky then sends the Paul Revere alert: "While NSPD 51 has the appearances of a domestic national security decision, it is nonetheless, an integral part of US foreign policy. It belongs to a longstanding military national security agenda. Were NSPD 51 to be invoked, Vice President Dick Cheney, who constitutes the real power behind the Executive, would essentially assume de facto dictatorial powers, circumventing both the US Congress and the Judiciary, while continuing to use President George W. Bush as a proxy figurehead."
But isn't Dick Cheney demonstrating his dictatorial power this very moment? Hasn't he told the National Archives, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, the entire Congress, the American people to all drop dead and go to hell? Was Kucinich wrong in targeting this monster for impeachment? The press knows that he is America's dictator; the Congress knows it; Kucinich knows it; Chossudovsky knows it, and I know it. Why isn't anything being done to stop this ticking international nuclear time bomb about ready to attack both America andIran? Can one madman rule America? Has America finally come to this?
Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report
Popular Mechanics examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11.
Introduction Background | Podcast | Blog | Book | FAQ | Sources
The Planes Where's The Pod? | No Stand-Down Order | Flight 175's Windows | Intercepts Not Routine
The World Trade Center Widespread Damage | "Melted" Steel | Puffs of Dust | Seismic Spikes | WTC 7 Collapse
The Pentagon Big Plane, Small Holes | Intact Windows | Flight 77 Debris
Flight 93 The White Jet | Roving Engine | Indian Lake | F-16 Pilot
By The Editors
Published in the March 2005 issue.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next »
See more...
Section Archive
KEYWORDS9/11
conspiracy theories
World Trade Center
Pentagon
aircraft
engineering
terrorism
homeland security
False Witness: Conspiracy theorists claim this photo "proves" the 9/11 attacks were a U.S. military operation. (Photograph by Rob Howard)
From the moment the first airplane crashed into the World Trade Center on the morning of September 11, 2001, the world has asked one simple and compelling question: How could it happen?
Three and a half years later, not everyone is convinced we know the truth. Go to Google.com, type in the search phrase "World Trade Center conspiracy" and you'll get links to an estimated 628,000 Web sites. More than 3000 books on 9/11 have been published; many of them reject the official consensus that hijackers associated with Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda flew passenger planes into U.S. landmarks.
Background
For background on this investigative feature, please click here.
Healthy skepticism, it seems, has curdled into paranoia. Wild conspiracy tales are peddled daily on the Internet, talk radio and in other media. Blurry photos, quotes taken out of context and sketchy eyewitness accounts have inspired a slew of elaborate theories: The Pentagon was struck by a missile; the World Trade Center was razed by demolition-style bombs; Flight 93 was shot down by a mysterious white jet. As outlandish as these claims may sound, they are increasingly accepted abroad and among extremists here in the United States.
To investigate 16 of the most prevalent claims made by conspiracy theorists, POPULAR MECHANICS assembled a team of nine researchers and reporters who, together with PM editors, consulted more than 70 professionals in fields that form the core content of this magazine, including aviation, engineering and the military.
In the end, we were able to debunk each of these assertions with hard evidence and a healthy dose of common sense. We learned that a few theories are based on something as innocent as a reporting error on that chaotic day. Others are the byproducts of cynical imaginations that aim to inject suspicion and animosity into public debate. Only by confronting such poisonous claims with irrefutable facts can we understand what really happened on a day that is forever seared into world history.
of course building 7 that wasn't hit by a airline, was hit by the falling parts of the towers and it too free falls into it's own footprint.
you are one of the reason people are taking a ass whipping from our government and doing nothing. you believe the horse shit they spoon feed you about shit like this. I guess al gore is 100 percent right as well. please hurry and pay your carbon taxes to do your part.
They made so many mistakes while doing 911 but yet people like you won't believe it. I can't understand looking at all of it how anyone above the 5th grade could believe their lie's. follow the money, you truly believe all those orders on just those two airline stocks was a fluke? that some rag heads that were only a month before going to school to learn to fly a little two seater airplane and they all failed, could just jump into the seat of those jets and at 30k feet at over 500 miles per hour, not only find those targets on the ground, but hit them.
take a beer can, fill it will gas and slam it into a steel beam. or maybe a 30-06 fired into a steel beam point blank
All the info anyone could wish for has been out there in print for years, but you still cling to utter nonsense?
There are no respectable scientists or investigators....NONE....who contend there were factors OTHER than those suicide planes which led to the tragedy. I doubt whether you've troubled to read any serious studies of the physics and chemistry involved.
why did they only set aside 3million dollars which 13 million ended up being used to investigate the whole deal? To shine some light on to that, we spent over 100 million to investigate bill getting a Blow Job.
The plane that was forced into the ground, where were the bodies? the seats? the plane parts? none were found.
what happen to the man they hired to take video and still shots and could go places only a few could go? well he didn't turn over those shots, so first his wife kills herself.. and then he took off running scared and is being protected by another country, for now.
your point is that we couldn't have done this because too many people had a hand in it and with that many people someone by now would have talked.
two teams, of 20 men each could have wired the main beams of both towers in a week. those same two teams could have been wiped out in the old stand by reason, died during training. Now grant you it takes months for a expert demolition team to take down a building, but they spent all that time making sure the buidling falls where it needs to, other building around it are not harmed, they have to wrap the beams and concrete over the entire area that is to be blasted, make sure that dust and fall out is held to a minimum, and many other elements they must factor it.
with a seal team, they don't have to spend anytime with that, plus they are using a powerful mix that public demolition companies can't use.
so your talking about a few teams that set all of that and now they are gone. anyone else that had a hand it in, are to high up and know better then to talk, and are raping trillions of dollars from it. They understand that by talking about it, they not only lose their wealth but their familes lives as well. anyone who had some kind of information that would shed light on this, they have shut down, others are to scare to say anything.
but lets set all that to one side. when you have a problem and you say it works this way and I say it doesn't. then the only thing we can fall back on is the SCIENCE of it. and the SCIENCE says two towers can not fall, in their own foot print, at free fall speed, after being hit with a aircraft. That force, with jet fuel and any other factor you want to throw at it, wind, age, rust, another fuel source in the basement, still is not enough according to the science to make those buildings fall.
Some say 'If you are not enraged, you are not paying attention'
There is so much going unreported & swept under the rug, that if the normal Joe or especially his Oprah brainwashed wife were to start taking note, there would be mass protesting & upheaval. We are witnessing blatant crime that we should not be experiencing - as a whole - BUT as long as it does not happen to "ME" than all is well.
When RED & Partzy speak of boobisAmericanus.... his content self watching the news & shaking his head before he resumes playing his Wii - they are right on. We are so pacified & joy-engulfed so long as no one breaks-down our door & rapes our children - that we brush aside what is really happening. Middle class America & her way of life are under siege, with belly full & fridge stocked with beer, life is grand! Meanwhile our comfort zone is shrinking, cities are turned to 'no-go' zones & the country our grandfathers knew...... is quite possibly lost.
Beyond that, all your conspiracy stuff is b.s. Two people cannot keep a secret much less some grandiose cabal which necessarily involves untold numbers of persons.
You want ME to do your research? That IS laughable! First, you need to learn 'critical thinking', how to differentiate between material which is written by opportunists seeking to line their pockets by catering to the gullible. The ploy has become so common it is now impossible to find ANY historical or contemporary event which has escaped the pen of the conspiricist authors.
Incidentally, your poor writing and inability to reason clearly are probably not unrelated. I do not say this to be unkind, or to belittle your efforts either. The ability to express oneself clearly and accurately are a measure of pride, learning, and excellence, which cannot be easily dismissed. And, also must affect reading comprehension as well. Not everyone understands what they read. That seems a simple proposition, but is too commonly overlooked, and is probably a major source of misunderstanding between persons.
If you want to be taken seriously, you'll have to evolve. No publisher would touch an ms written so badly. Not even poorly written books/novels compare to your scribbling. Spell checker would be a start.
Pearl harbor, vietnam, world war 1,2 and 3 as well. Irag the first time, afganastan, Irag the secound time, aids, H1N1, famine in africa,
the korean war, the atomic bomd.
PS- costa rica is indebted by the IMF as well, did you read the front of am costa rica this am, dont talk to iran or else, Mrs clinton, an elite member of the bilderberger group.
Ya I am a real wack job
Everthing I mentioned has more proof than not, declassified gov docs to prove it.
Ya I am a real wack job.
Have you ever for one moment spent the time to research any of these things, I think not. I have, I have read declassified docs I have read the climate gate leaked emails.
all public record, all on the internet directly form the fed gov.
Everthing I mentioned, yep, the gulf of tonkin the start of vietnam,
Ya I am a real wack job.
No Iam the real deal, the real informed , the real awake, the real freedom freak, the real wack job.
The NWO ( new world order) is just about in place and most still believe it is good to have everything in their lives cottled for them.
1.
Late summer 07 Just before the shit actually hit the fan, I told my partner of 13 years ,who was in the middle of thinking he was going to loose a spec house in the states, it has only just started, he said what has just started,
I said real estate will just keep dropping and dropping, he said your a conspiracy nut, and we laughed.
then 1 year later we were talking on the phone, he said I take it all back,( he had lost the house and his family home ) you arnt really crazy, we just laughed.
I said the goal of the nwo is to force the people of the US ( and other countries you dont really see it unless you travel there) to their knees, How, he says, I says, lower house prices, get he max number of forclosures,
and none payments, this could be any number of areas, just dirt , car loans, credit cards , health care, food prices, just look around you can spot this things.
Once everyone cryed uncle, lets maybe see if we can get them to refi and stay in there house or work out lower payments on the cards etc. ( and make another ton of money off the interest on the first few years of the loans.)
Then as all those people are gettin on board , they are working on the the others by taking their house , kids college money, repoing their cars , threating them with none payments and ruined credit and social outcast.
( I FIT IN HERE SOME WHERE , SO TRUST ME I BEEN THROUGH IT FIRST HAND AND HAVE STUDIED THEIR MOVES).
Now this still hasnt hit bottem, they need the majority on their knees and need possesion of everything the can. Some are still fighting, spending there lifes saving to save a house they will never really own anyway.
Thats just skimming the top on that issue books have bee written on this.
2.
The propoganda machine
People will believe most anything they see on tv
The corporate media, owned and programmed by the people that want to control your life. The control is suttle and mostly painless so no one knows.
H1N1- man made or not real or not, consider only 3 % of all cases on the entire planet tested are actually H1N1, the rest fall intot he other catagory. Yes only 3% and yes I can link people to the data.
the doctors were told to just vebally diagnos by the ssymtoms, most would not pay for the test nor would insurance , isnt that odd ?
But the gov controlled by the nwo order would purchase trillions in a vacine not even proven safe or effective, get paid and then not even deliver, I would rather die than get a shot of there poison.
3.
The military industrial complex.
100 years in the making, dozens of false wars , coups, masicares, etc.
4.
The climategate scandle, only people who are awake know about this, the corporate media spon this around as well.
5.
A carbon tax on your cow, dog, kid, car , gas food, elect,
In a nut shell a tax on everything you use to help fund the nwo total take over of your personal soverienghty. YOUR FREEDON AS YOU THINK YOU KNOW IT.
glad that you are at least trying to inform people. but the tin hat looks will always be there. most people don't want to believe it, even thou the facts are in their face more and more. they won't believe it even when they see it. they will just go along to get along and keep telling everyone that this is a better way, that we need to do this..
I saw something the other day that many people should listen too.. it was a national geographic special which is on tv right now.. so if you can watch it, for this part alone.. it talks about how the earth will be 1 to 100 years without people.. one shot shows a tall metal building in ca. that will burn up from wild fires, and it says even thou the fire will reach 2400 degrees it will only burn the inside things and it burns for day's without firemen,, and what will be left is the iron beams still standing.. hummm 911 burned a little while and then the whole building imploded even the concrete turned to dust..
I have seen home after home that has burned all the way to the concrete, and a fireplace will be the only thing standing everytime.
I do not have a cable or sat here in cr, only internet, when I was at home in the states I did have a tv, but only to watch a movie, no cabke or sat for over 10 years.
I do not drink beer or hard liquor, a glass of red wine socially.
I beleive I am awake, but have only consiously been this way for a little over a year, sub consiously my whole life though.
Personnal soveriegty is very very very very important to me .
And when I understand what I need to do to stop the tyranny that is happening, trust me I will be there,
Right now learning to inform and awaken people to the NWO is what I will continue to do.
it is a slow process learning how to articulate it the right way, as not to recieve that dumbed down you are crazy lok from people.
wow so your awake? now? maybe? and could you please tell me how you feel things will change quick, I mean are you going to pitch in and help push, or sit on your couch and maybe have only 7 beers tonight and watch tv till 12? I'm not bitchin at you per say on that, I just would like to point out that the bad headlight on your car ain't agonna fix itself..
I don't have a dog in this fight, maybe one day when it comes to my door I will. until then all I can do is hope that all of you understand and see what is really going on and maybe get together on what should be done. Right now as it stands, on freedom, I can't say what I want to say because you don't have freedom of speech anymore. I for one really don't want to be returned to the u.s in leg chains either.
I think and this is just off the top of my head now.. nothing to back this up.. but I think the u.s. will be split up, with other countries around the world. This will allow none of the american people to be together on anything. That will weaken the u.s to a state that it will be very easy to control. we already have a new president of the EU. once obama signs this new treaty, all power is given over to them, and your rights will be nothing but a well read, well worn, old outdated piece of histroy. big O will enjoy handing over everything to the poorest countries. after all this is what he was all about during his way to the white house, you see the men in power couldn't put a man in the white house that was going to fight for our rights or freedom, or someone who would make the right calls to save the u.s. from being broke, or watch her people starve, they picked a man that wasn't even born on this soil, he has no honor or duty to the people of the u.s. and has no problem handing out the keys to her to who ever they tell him too, because he knows it will get him a seat at that fine dinner table.
of course once the fox sweet talks the farmer into letting him guard the chickens, he no longer needs to be nice to the farmer now does he?
"Winchester to Deliver 200 Million 40-Cal. Rounds to Homeland Security"
AUGUST 22, 2009
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Winchester Ammunition was recently awarded a contract by the Immigration, Customs and Enforcement (ICE) division of the Department of Homeland Security to supply a maximum of 200 million, 40 cal. rounds over the next five years.
The load selected for this contract is a 135-grain, hollow point designed for the office of Field Operations of Customs and Border Protection. It will fall under the Winchester Ranger line.
Next up, a recap of sorts:
Obama's Big Sellout
The president has packed his economic team with Wall Street insiders intent on turning the bailout into an all-out giveaway
MATT TAIBBI-Rolling Stone
Posted Dec 09, 2009 2:35 PM
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/31234647/obamas_big_sellout/print
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Finally its off to the Vomitorium:
Toward the beginning of his speech the first standing American president in ninety years to receive the Peace Prize acknowledged that "perhaps the most profound issue surrounding my receipt of this prize is the fact that "I am the Commander-in-Chief of the military of a nation in the midst of two wars."
&
In language that never before was heard during a peace prize acceptance speech, Obama added "we are at war, and I'm responsible for the deployment of thousands of young Americans to battle in a distant land. Some will kill, and some will be killed."
many of you might think o well not our fight, let them deal with it, but if that is not cause to fight what the hell is?
If you were sitting in bar not bugging anyone and some asshole comes up and starts shit with you, hell I would stand up and have your back, but if you were asking for it, be you friend or not, your own your own. these were people, children that did nothing but be born to the wrong tribe. what has happen to man kind? where has our fairness and judgement gone. we once had those things, what happen to them, where did the gold string of all that is right and fair and good get broken as it was passed down from grand father to grandchild over hundreds of years? all that is now forgotten, and what is passed down is evil and hate, and care nothing for anyone but yourself. get yours at any cost even at the cost of the innocent.
President Obama receives his Nobel Peace Prize medal -
President Barack Obama has said the US must uphold moral standards when waging wars that are necessary and justified, as he accepted his Nobel Peace Prize.
In his speech in Oslo, he defended the US role in Afghanistan, arguing the use of force could bring lasting peace.
He also said his accomplishments were slight compared to previous laureates.
Mr Obama was given the prize in October for his "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples".
Thursday's ceremony in the Norwegian capital came days after Mr Obama announced he was sending 30,000 extra US soldiers to the war in Afghanistan.
'Far more deserving'
There was a mixed reaction when he was named as the winner of this year's prize - only the fourth US president in history to be given the honour.
A non-violent movement could not have halted Hitler's armies - negotiations cannot convince al-Qaeda's leaders to lay down their arms
Barack Obama
Mr Obama's elevation to the rank of fellow laureates such as Nelson Mandela, Mother Teresa and Martin Luther King, before he has even spent a year in office, has sparked fierce debate.
Critics also said it was inappropriate for the honour to go to the commander-in-chief of a country involved in conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Acknowledging the controversy, Mr Obama began by saying: "Compared to some of the giants of history who have received this prize... my accomplishments are slight."
What intrigues me most about the Japanese are the paradoxes of culture set against their behaviour in war. Their virtues are many; hygienic, industrious, artistic, inventive, intelligent, honest to a fault, and the list goes on.
How could people with such a rich 'culture' be so cruel? [Germans included] What should we take from all this?
The important thing about History is that it is exactly as Twain [?] said about the news; "change the names, dates, and places, and that is the daily news".
Dare, if you will to look at uTube....'the rape of Nanking', and related videos.
How the government tries to fleece you and what you can do about it
After a relaxing Thanksgiving break, I anticipated to return to work in a lighter frame of mind. However, the following item from FOX News crushed that hope right away:
Lawmakers Propose 'War Surtax' to Pay for Troop Increase in Afghanistan
Two top Democrats say they want to impose a new tax on the wealthy to finance any increase in U.S. troops for the Afghanistan war.
Rep. David Obey, D-Wis., chairman of the purse string-controlling House Appropriations Committee, is calling the idea a "war surtax." He said that just as the federal government is expected to pay for its proposed intervention in the health care sector with new taxes, any escalated involvement in Afghanistan should come with a payment plan.
"If we have to pay for the health care bill, we should pay for the war as well ... by having a war surtax," Obey told ABC News in an interview that aired Monday. "The problem in this country with this issue is that the only people that has to sacrifice are military families and they've had to go to the well again and again and again and again, and everybody else is blithely unaffected by the war."
Readers of my free missive, Casey’s Daily Dispatch, know I’m vehemently opposed to the doomed adventure in Afghanistan. On that front alone, the idea of a war tax is like a shard of glass in my eye.
But it’s even worse than that. It shows just how degraded this country has become – picking the pockets of the productive is now pretty much the only remaining source of funding the administration and its allies can imagine.
Just to be sure we keep this in perspective: At this moment, if you earn more than $250,000 a year (which isn’t what it used to be, given the steady erosion of inflation over the last 30 years), you will pay federal income taxes of about 35%, no estate taxes, and a 15% capital gains tax should the money you put at risk in the market return a profit.
As soon as next year – if the government moves up the expiration of the Bush tax cuts, as I very much expect them to – the top tax bracket will go to 39%. On top of that, the current healthcare legislation will add a 5.4% surcharge. Then, add in the Democrats’ proposed 5% war tax. So straight up we’re talking 49%.
Then there’s a near doubling of capital gains taxes, from 15% to as high as 28%. And, of course, the return of the estate tax.
But that’s just for starters, because everywhere you look states and municipalities are raising taxes and fees, and attorney generals, taking a page out of Caligula’s playbook, are casting about for their next deep-pocketed victim.
At the end of the day, the top tax rate in the U.S., starting as early as next year, will soar way over 50% of income. While further number crunching is required, it is a very safe assumption that top income earners will soon be paying over 65% of their income in taxes.